On 09- 11 December 2011 in the Hotel Milenium, Bitola within the School of Public Policy “Mother Teresa” was organized the Second Session Generation 2011/2012.
Generation 2011/2012, Hotel Milenium, Bitola
[slideshow id=9 w=480 h=320]
PROGRAM
Day 1: 09th December
17:00-17:15
Opening of the Second Session of the School of Public Policy |Mother Teresa|, “Improving public policy in Western Balkans”, Zhidas Daskalovski, Director of the School of Public Policy “Mother Teresa”
17:15 – 17:45
Lecture: The process of creating public policies of the green political parties in Macedonia
Lecturer: Liljana Popovska, MP (DOM)
17:45 – 19:00
Lecture: “The participation of the citizens in the process of creating public policies”
Lecturer: Irena Cvetkovic, Coalition “Sexual and health right of marginalized communities”
19:00 – 20:30
Dinner
20:30 – 22:00
Stand-up comedy (live) with Marijan Georgievski
Day 2: 10th December
9:00 – 10:00
Breakfast
10:00-11:15
Lecture: The Role of CSOs in Improving Public Policies at Regional Level
Lecturer: Borislav Mavrov, PhD – Program Director of European Institute, Sofia, Bulgaria
11:15 – 11:45
Coffee break
11:45 – 13:00
Lecture: Public Policy Formulation and Development Planning
Lecturer: Juliana Nikolova, Adviser to the Prime Minister cabinet on European policy matters, Sofia, Bulgaria
13:30 – 14:30
Lunch
14:30 – 16:00
Coffee at Širok Sokak
16:00 – 17:15
Side event (Presentation of the doctoral dissertation)
Lecture: Relationship (historical and contemporary) between the AegeanMacedonian refugees and the sovereignties under which they have lived (Greece, Poland, Macedonia, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, etc.)
Lecturer: Daniel Pout, PhD Candidate
17:15 – 17:45
Break
17:45 – 19:00
Lecture: “The process of creating public policies with particular reference to Republic of Macedonia”
Lecturer: Jonuz Abdulahi, PhD
19:00 – 20:00
Dinner
20:00 – 20:30
Presentation of the Summer University in Strasbourg 2011 – participants from the previous generation
20:30 – 22:00
Case study
Moderator: Mile Aleksoski
22:00
watching the football game: Real Madrid – Barcelona (optional)
Day 3: 11th December
09:00 – 10:00
Breakfast
10:00 – 11:15
Lecture: The accession process of the Western Balkan countries in the European Union
Lecturer: Arta Ibrahimi, PhD
11:15 – 12: 15
Lecture: “The position and function of the national parliaments in EU and the European integration of the Macedonian assembly”
Lecturer: Karolina Ristova Asterud, PhD
12:30
Bitola sightseeing
14:00
Lunch
15:00
Departure
EVALUATION
1. Are you satisfied with the choice of topics at the second session of the school?Answer: 17 Yes 3 No1. 2. If yes, please indicate with 1-5 how much you are satisfied with the choice of topics, while 1 being least and 5 the most.
Answer: 4.53
2. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Liljana Popovska, MP?
Answer: 3.12
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 20%
B) it introduced an interesting topic 40%
C) it was known 13%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 0%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 27%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 0%
3. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Irena Cvetkovic?
Answer: 4.26
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 33.3%
B)it introduced an interesting topic 33.3%
C) it was known 6.7%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 20%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 0%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 6.7%
4. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Borislav Mavrov from Sofia, Bulgaria?
Answer: 3.66
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 16.7%
B) it introduced an interesting topic 22.2%
C) it was known 33.3%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 16.7%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 11.1%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 0%
5. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Juliana Nikolova from Sofia, Bulgaria?
Answer: 3.76
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 23.53%
B) it introduced an interesting topic 41.17%
C) it was known 5.88%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 17.65%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 11.77%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 0%
6. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Prof. Daniel Pout?
Answer: 3.62
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 20%
B) it introduced an interesting topic 13%
C) it was known 7%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 13%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 40%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 7%
7. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Prof. Dr. Jonuz Abdulai?
Answer: 3.70
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 11.8%
B) it introduced an interesting topic 17.7%
C) it was known 35.4%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 23.3%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 11.8%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 0%
8. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Mile Aleksoski?
Answer: 4.83
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 55.60%
B) it introduced an interesting topic 33.30%
C) it was known 0%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 5.55%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 0%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 5.55%
9. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Prof. Dr. Arta Ibrahimi?
Answer: 3.88
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 52.93%
B) it introduced an interesting topic 11.77%
C) it was known 5.88%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 11.77%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 11.77%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 5.88%
10. How much you are generally satisfied with the lecture of Prof. Dr. Karolina Ristova Asterud?
Answer: 4.22
Circle the most appropriate answer!
The lecture:
A) it gave me new knowledge about the topic 55.2%
B) it introduced an interesting topic 11.2%
C) it was known 5.6%
D) it contributed to develop an interesting discussion 11.2%
E) it was a good topic but monotonous 11.2%
F) it was too high for my knowledge 0%
G) it was a topic not appropriate for the session 5.6%
11. .What would be your suggestion for topics for the future session of the School?
Political culture; The Council of Europe and the challenges today; Ecology; Multiculturalism; Local governance and decentralization; Crisis management;Geopolitics; Economy; Sustainable Development; Public opinion and mass communications.
12. What would be your suggestion for the lecturer (domestic, foreign) for the next session of the school and the topic?
Zarko Puhovski, Croatia; Teuta Arufi; Ferid Muhic; Tatjana Petrushevska; Adelina Marku; Besa Arifi; Saso Georgievski; Mirka Velinovska; Nazmi Maliki; Lidija Georgieva; Suad Misini; Dane Taleski.
13. What did you missed during the session?
Individual answers:
– It will be interesting if we have more time to debate
– Lecturers to choose more interesting topics/lectures
15. How much you are satisfied with the organizing team of the School?
Answer: 4.89
15. Did you learn new things from the discussions of the other participants during the school session?
20 Yes / No
16. Please rate from 1-5, with 1 being least and 5 the most?
A) Availability of location
Answer: 4.94
B) Availability of the information for the sessions prior to and during the session
Answer: 4.83
C) Availability of materials by lecturers
Answer: 4.44
D) Food and hotel service?
Answer: 4.55
E) Availability of the organizing team of the School
Answer: 4.89
17. How much are you satisfied with the organization of the activities outside the lecture?
Answer: 4.61
18. Additional Comment
Individual comments:
1. To establish rules for discussions
2. Different menu for the meals
3. There should be discussion and debate but primarily we are here for the lecturers
4. The session was weaker compared with the previous one regarding the topic
5. The lecturers were excellent
6. It will be better if we do not have evening lectures
